The debate over Kerala government's move on amendments in Kerala Lokayukta Act
SHARE:
Proposal of amendment in Kerala Lokayukta Act criticised
Read more on - Polity | Economy | Schemes | S&T | Environment
- The story: The Kerala government’s proposal to amend the Kerala Lokayukta Act 2013 has been criticised by the opposition. The proposed ordinance envisages to limit the powers of the anti-corruption monitor.
- Proposed changes: The Kerala cabinet recommended the Governor to promulgates the ordinance sought to give the government powers to “either accept or reject the verdict of the Lokayukta, after giving an opportunity of being heard”. By this the quasi-judicial institution will turn into a toothless advisory body.
- Lokpal and Lokayuktas: The Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, 2013 provided for the establishment of Lokpal for the Union and Lokayukta for States. These institutions are statutory bodies without any constitutional status. They perform the function of an "ombudsman” and inquire into allegations of corruption against certain public functionaries and for related matters. The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 provides for establishing a Lokpal headed by a Chairperson.
- The Chairperson can be a Chief Justice of India, or is or has been a judge of the Supreme Court, or an eminent person who fulfills eligibility criteria as specified. Of its other members, not exceeding eight, 50% are to be judicial members, provided that not less than 50% belong to the SCs, STs, OBCs, minorities, or are women.
- The Lokpal was appointed in March 2019 and it started functioning since March 2020 when its rules were framed. The Lokpal is at present headed by former Supreme Court Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose.
- The Lokpal has jurisdiction to inquire into allegations of corruption against anyone who is or has been Prime Minister, or a Minister in the Union government, or a Member of Parliament, as well as officials of the Union government under Groups A, B, C and D.
- Also covered are chairpersons, members, officers and directors of any board, corporation, society, trust or autonomous body either established by an Act of Parliament or wholly or partly funded by the Centre. It also covers any society or trust or body that receives foreign contributions above Rs. 10 lakh.
- History of "Ombudsman" in India: In 1809, the institution of ombudsman was inaugurated officially in Sweden. In the 20th century, the Ombudsman as an institution developed and grew most significantly after the Second World War (1939-45). In 1967, on the recommendations of the Whyatt Report of 1961, Great Britain adopted the institution of the ombudsman and became the first large nation in the democratic world to have such a system. In India, the concept of constitutional ombudsman was first proposed by the then law minister Ashok Kumar Sen in parliament in the early 1960s. The terms Lokpal and Lokayukta were coined by Dr. L. M. Singhvi.
- In 1966, the First Administrative Reforms Commission recommended the setting up of two independent authorities- at the central and state level, to look into complaints against public functionaries, including MPs.
- In 1968, Lokpal bill was passed in Lok Sabha but lapsed with the dissolution of Lok Sabha and since then it lapsed in the Lok Sabha many times.
- In 2002, the Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution headed by M.N. Venkatachaliah recommended the appointment of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas; also recommended that the PM be kept out of the ambit of the authority.
- In 2005, the Second Administrative Reforms Commission chaired by Veerappa Moily recommended that the office of Lokpal should be established without delay.
- In 2011, social movement "India Against Corruption movement" led by Anna Hazare put pressure on the government at the Centre and resulted in the passing of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill, 2013.
- Working of Lokayukta in the States: The Section 63 of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 states: “Every state shall establish a body to be known as the Lokayukta for the State, if not so established, constituted or appointed, by a law made by the State Legislature”. It will be created to deal with complaints relating to corruption against certain public functionaries, within a period of one year from the date of commencement of this Act but the law is a mere framework, leaving it to the states to decide the specifics. Given that states have autonomy to frame their own laws, the Lokayukta’s powers vary from state to state on various aspects, such as tenure, and need of sanction to prosecute officials. When the 2013 Act was passed, Lokayuktas were already functioning in some states - including in Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka where they were very active. Following the Act and the intervention of the Supreme Court, most states have now set up a Lokayukta.
- Summary: Struggle against corruption can be strengthened only through a comprehensive reform of our political, legal, administrative and judicial systems. The establishment of an effective Lokpal institution is only one measure. ‘Lokayuktas’ should be established in the states on the lines of the ‘Lokpal’ with all the administrative machinery under purview of it.
- EXAM QUESTIONS: (1) Critically examine the issues involved in the working of Lokayuktas in state compared to the Lokpal at the centre. Suggest methods to make the idea effective. (2) Even years after the Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, 2013 being enacted, various provisions of the Act have not been implemented. Examine analytically.
* Content sourced from free internet sources (publications, PIB site, international sites, etc.). Take your own subscriptions. Copyrights acknowledged.
COMMENTS