Excellent study material for all civil services aspirants - begin learning - Kar ke dikhayenge!
SC holds Prashant Bhushan guilty of contempt over tweets against CJI, Judiciary
Read more on - Polity | Economy | Schemes | S&T | Environment
Key points –
- The Supreme Court has held advocate Prashant Bhushan guilty of contempt in a case registered against him over two of his tweets.
- A bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra said the court will hear the arguments on the quantum of punishment on August 20.
- The senior lawyer can be punished with a simple imprisonment for a term which may extend up to six months or with a fine of up to Rs 2,000 or with both.
- On June 29, Bhushan had tweeted on a photo of Chief Justice of India SA Bobde astride a Harley Davidson motorcycle.
- While taking up the matter for hearing, the bench took note of another tweet by the advocate on June 27 regarding the judiciary which it said was published in The Times of India.
- The lawyer said the posts were against the judges regarding their conduct in their personal capacity and they did not obstruct administration of justice.
- On July 22, the top court issued a show cause notice to the lawyer after initiating the criminal contempt against him, saying that the tweets had “brought the administration of justice in disrepute”. The bench had also added Twitter India as a party to the matter.
- Currently, Bhushan is appearing in the Supreme Court for the Centre for Public Interest Litigation, seeking transfer of PM Cares funds to the National Disaster Response Fund.
- He also represents the Association for Democratic Reforms in a petition challenging the Electoral Bond Scheme.
- According to the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, contempt of court can either be civil contempt or criminal contempt.
- Civil contempt means wilful disobedience to any judgment, decree, direction, order, writ or other process of a court or wilful breach of an undertaking given to a court.
- On the other hand, criminal contempt means the publication (whether by words, spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representations, or otherwise) of any matter or the doing of any other act whatsoever which
- (i) scandalises or tends to scandalise, or lowers or tends to lower the authority of, any court; or
- (ii) prejudices, or interferes or tends to interfere with, the due course of any judicial proceeding; or
- (iii) interferes or tends to interfere with, or obstructs or tends to obstruct, the administration of justice in any other manner.
* Content sourced from free internet sources (publications, PIB site, international sites, etc.). Take your
own subscriptions. Copyrights acknowledged.
COMMENTS