Excellent study material for all civil services aspirants - begin learning - Kar ke dikhayenge!
SHARE:
Subsidies in Higher Education
Read more on - Polity | Economy | Schemes | S&T | Environment
- Indian social situation: Almost more than a fifth of the population is below official poverty limits and 93% of the workforce is engaged in the unorganised sector, subsidized education provides access to quality education to the poor. Subsidies in education generate a host of positive externalities such as health improvement, reduction in poverty, crime and population growth. It directly or indirectly influences almost all facets of social life, and therefore should be viewed as a non-negotiable public good and by far the most potent social investment.
- Advantages of Subsidies in Higher Education:
- Inclusiveness and Equity - Subsidies in higher education have enabled the marginalised and socio-economically backward sections of the society to get access to quality higher education which has largely been the domain of socially dominant groups in the society. These two are very important characteristics of a good public institution. And, over the years, this has actually increased in public institutions and that is entirely because of subsidy.
- Economic - Subsidized education plays a significant role in building an economy as in the case of India. Students engaged with research and specialized education go on to become better contributors to the economy. Higher education boosts innovation, creative thinking and innovations. Example: Software segment which comprises a huge share in India’s GDP is a shining example of positive externalities from subsidies in higher education.
- Demographic Dividend - India is one of the youngest nations in the world comprising a huge chunk of population in favourable demographic phase. However, this young population's educational and skill status is not aligned with the requirements of the market. Therefore, subsidies in the higher education sector have a greater role to play in reaping the benefits of demographic dividends.
- Social Mobility - Earlier, higher education used to be the exclusive preserve of elites, and other socially and economically backward classes were deprived of higher education. But due to the efforts made by the government (in the form of subsidies and other benefits) to make it within the reach of every social group, a large number of poor and the marginalised have to begin to express their aspirations for social mobility through access to higher public education institutions.
- Human Capital - The country has developed a wide network of institutions like CSIR, IITs and Central Universities which provide quality subsidized education to the masses. These institutions have become the nucleus of providing trained workforce in propelling research and development and economic growth in the country. Students of all sections of society from these institutions went on to occupy the higher positions in government in forms of engineers, doctors, bureaucrats etc.
- Liberalisation and Higher Education in India: In the post-liberalisation era, public expenditure in higher education went through a period of stagnation in real terms, and the per-student public expenditure actually declined dramatically. All this happened while private higher education saw a phase of impressive expansion. So, while the overall intake of students in higher education increased considerably in the post-liberalisation era, a large proportion of this expansion was accounted for by expanding the private sector. Growth in national income did not result in an increase in public expenditure on education as a whole. It kind of stagnated. Within the education sector as a whole, there was a shift in the focus of funding in the 1990s from higher education to primary education.
- Problem with Subsidies: Subsidies are intended to serve the vulnerable section of society. However, it is often seen that these benefits of subsidies are exploited by the middle and elite sections of society. Access without assured quality is no access. Also, there has been a lot of clamour that subsidies hamper meritocracy. There is considerable unevenness in the distribution of public finances. Student subsidies for premier institutions like the IITs and engineering colleges are incomparably higher than those for universities and colleges, particularly for liberal arts institutions. Private institutions are generally not likely to be amenable to measures promoting access and equity. Therefore, a large number of private education institutions remain inaccessible to economy weaker sections.
- Summary: Benefits can be skewed in the absence of regulation. Therefore, eliminating free riders is the biggest challenge in the dissemination of subsidies. Technological improvement like Aadhar, direct benefit transfer can be used to eliminate inclusion and exclusion errors. The third-party verifications of the beneficiary will help in eliminating the free riders. Rationalisation of fee structure according to the demand of programmes based on marketability, affordability and input cost and according to different income groups could pave the way for optimal utilization of subsidies. Providing free or subsidized higher education to students from lower-income groups could pave the way for a more equitable and just society. Some large public universities should now approach the 20% mark as recommended by the Punnayya Committee and National Knowledge Commission. A proper regulatory mechanism should be placed in order to make private institutions in line with the government's goal of making higher education accessible and affordable to vulnerable sections.
* Content sourced from free internet sources (publications, PIB site, international sites, etc.). Take your
own subscriptions. Copyrights acknowledged.
COMMENTS